top of page

Designing Public Communication for Clarity and Trust

  • Writer: Naomi Barron
    Naomi Barron
  • Oct 10
  • 3 min read

Updated: Oct 11

When a city ordinance changes overnight, confusion spreads faster than information. People wonder who decided it, when it happened, and why they were not told sooner. Public communication often fails, not because residents do not care, but because information is delivered in ways that people do not understand or trust.


People are more likely to support intiatives when they see themselves as main characters of the story.

My background in marketing and public outreach has shown me that communication, whether promoting a product or a public service, depends on the same foundation: people respond to clarity, relevance, and respect. Over time, I have seen how communities can turn confusion into collaboration when communication focuses less on compliance and more on connection.


1. Build Buy-In, Not Compliance


When information only tells people what to do, it creates resistance. When it invites participation, it creates buy-in. In public health outreach, I saw this firsthand. Fear-based campaigns about tobacco use had lost their impact. People already knew the risks, yet the messaging still focused on warning them. The approach was outdated and disconnected from what they cared about. Instead, we reframed the message to focus on tobacco users seeing themselves with an improved quality of life and freedom from tobacco addiction. We helped people see what they could gain through real stories, resources, support, and relationships on their journey rather than focusing on what they had to give up, public shaming, or treating them as the problem.


The same principle applies to civic communication. A goal for encouraging behavior change can be encouraging our audience to see themselves in a new light, happy, healthier, and living. If we in public outreach do not know or understand what people want, we can also ask and run social listening audits. Messaging doesn't need to be complicated, and listening with an open ear is a great place to start. However, starting with rules and compliance feels more like control, not an active choice someone makes for their lives.


2. Shape Perception Through Honest Positioning


The way information is positioned determines how people respond. During the tobacco prevention campaign, the industry reframed its message to make e-cigarettes seem like a healthy alternative to smoking. That narrative was misleading, but it also revealed how powerful reframing can be.


To counter it, we grounded our communication in truth. Instead of repeating anti-tobacco slogans, we talked about control, choice, and empowerment. We focused on what was possible, not what was forbidden, by sharing stories of the people who lived through the "quit smoking" experience. This shift changed how people perceived the conversation and gave them ownership of their decision to change.


For public institutions, the lesson is simple: credibility depends on honesty. Selling fantasy or using overly polished language might attract attention, but it does not sustain trust. Real communication connects when people can see themselves in the story being told.


3. Design for Access, Not Just Awareness


Public information cannot build trust if people cannot access or understand it. Accessibility is more than translating a message or posting it online. It is about designing communication so it meets people where they are.


That means writing in plain language, using clear visuals, and adapting content for multiple platforms and reading levels. It also means creating opportunities for two-way communication, whether through community events, surveys, or feedback loops.


In practice, access requires intention. When information is easy to find, read, and share, people engage naturally. Clarity builds confidence, and confidence leads to participation.

When communication is built with access and understanding in mind, it stops being a reaction to problems and becomes a foundation for progress.


The Fix Is Simpler Than We Think


Leading and guiding the conversation is at the heart of effective public communication. The biggest misconception is that delivering more information equals better communication. Rather, people do not necessarily need more content; they need information served in a way that is easy to take in. They need clearer context. They need to understand how information connects to their lives and what they can do with it. When messages are presented in smaller, more digestible pieces, understanding and action follow naturally.


Quick Tips: Increase Click Conversions

  • On social media, focus on the main idea per post instead of posting images of long public statements or compacted text.

  • Choose a single quote, explain why it matters,

  • Link and guide people back to the website where they can find the full context or article.


When public facing organizations treat communication as a form of service design rather than an afterthought, we start leading and guiding the conversations. Good communication is not about how much we say but how clearly and accessibly we say it. The solution is not louder messaging or longer campaigns. It is relevance, consistency, and a commitment to respect the audience we serve.

 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.

All Rights Reserved © 2025,  Naomi Barron

  • LinkedIn
bottom of page